Government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting. Agree or disagree.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s is a world is a colossal upsurge in government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of stance. The most preponderant one is that arts and music can not only contribute to investment, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity, and quality of their lives, with much cause of efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one is good stead as for as arguments their chances of prosperity and excellence are concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such as system can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication, and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of arts, music, and painting of indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | gobindh Singh | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | jashan randhawa | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | richierich25 | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Dinuka Dissanayaje | 75 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | vaibhav Ithape | 55 | view |
- Important for students to study literature and history 72
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle or improve the network of public transport 77
- In many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. some people regard this as completely wrong while other consider it is valuable work experience, important foe learning and taking responsibility. what is your opinion? 69
- Some people thinks that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. which opinion do you agree with? 77
- some people thinks law changes human behavior? do you agree with it. 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96734693878 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85454692566 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54693877551 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.931034482759 752% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8115074504 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.636363636 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256579190305 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112979609845 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186036862763 0.071462118173 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163554381621 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918409966572 0.0609392437508 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.