Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it's actually an illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Please talk about the validity and the implications.
Recently, the phenomenon of "governments promise continuous economic growth, but it's actually an illusion, and some people think that governments should abandon this" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that economic growth might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the role of governments in the economic growth can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, promising continuous economic growth can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that improving life quality and earning more income are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of employment rates. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the national gross production and the elimination of gaps distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, an illusion of continuous economic growth might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the society's disappointment. Moreover, fundamental aspects of economic depression can relate to the reality that the demerits of the governments' promises can pertain to an illusion. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the lack of budgets were correlated positively with economic sanctions, the local authorities would ultimately address poverty issues. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconcieved notion of critical thinking in economics problems.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of promising continuous economic growth far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-04 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-07-13 | Gohar Khan | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-29 | Janabakhshi | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Maheswari | 44 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | mg1 | 85 | view |
- Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your ans 89
- Business whether big or small is to maximize profit Do you agree with that Give your opinion 49
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge Write a 89
- The charts below show the results of a survey if adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer descr 72
- It is often argued that studying overseas is overrated There are many scholars who study locally Is travel really necessary for a better education 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89236111111 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25991003045 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631944444444 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0932290212 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.272727273 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359723681616 0.242375264174 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120716091056 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109884810631 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197629726873 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116188956538 0.0609392437508 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.