Governments should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree
Recently, the phenomanon of declining the budget of arts categories and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this issue is relatively beneficial as it regarded by a substantial individuals both instructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that this reducing can be a minus as it could develop some catastrophic effects for its adherents and the society.
From a social standpoint, decreasing the amount of invest in arts can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in diminishing the calm. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academin experiment which discovered the principles of arts including music, painting and cinema. That study showed arts can diminish the stress which is one of the most difficulties in the sedantary lifestyle. Furthermore, it was proved that arts can refresh the minds. Moreover, it was argued that all kind of arts can foster some lerning and cognative skills among the youths, for example by learning the rhythms and the styles of painting.
On the one hand, there is no doubt diminishing the amount of art budget by governments has some advocates. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university has asserted that inhabitants believe that there are some other priorities to invest including health, mariage, public transportation, boost and develop the sanitation system and education. They mentioned that art is a nutrient for spiritual needs and has not high priority.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of this decline far outweigh its benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | gobindh Singh | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | jashan randhawa | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | Sinabri | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | richierich25 | 77 | view |
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with opposing viewing.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 66
- Mass media like TV and newspapers influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works a pivot to shape the society? 77
- People usually mix their private and professional life. What are the pros and cons of this? 85
- Experience is more important than books and formal school education. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 85
- The major purpose of television is to educate, not to entertain. Do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'individual'?
Suggestion: individual
...eficial as it regarded by a substantial individuals both instructive and positive, others h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example, kind of, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39781021898 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07370564055 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594890510949 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9143069547 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0591579941105 0.242375264174 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196182163582 0.0925447433944 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0200639515299 0.071462118173 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0291329746866 0.151781067708 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191739197633 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.