Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries. How far do you agree with this statement? Use your own examples to support.
Recently, the phenomenon of "hosting sport events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that sport events might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the benefit of hosting sport events can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, hosting sport events can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that more income and prospering businesses are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the benefits of sport events for host countries. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both earnings of sport teams and participating in the Olympics distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, the benefits of hosting sport events might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of economic depression. Moreover, fundamental aspects of responsibilities of host countries can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of infrastructures can pertain to the absence of federal budgets. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the World Cup were correlated positively with the power of athletes, the local authorities would ultimately address constructing stadiums. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of promoting the sport tourism.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of hosting sport events for the host countries far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-07 | sattar_iust | 69 | view |
| 2020-06-28 | Gohar Khan | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | peterzakaria | 65 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | neelu sharma | 93 | view |
| 2019-03-22 | Kushi | 54 | view |
- People should take part in sports either in individual or in teams because people can learn many useful skills How far do you agree Explain and use examples or your own experience 85
- Scientists believe that the increasing average temperature is an issue What caused global warming and present solution to reduce its effect 88
- The plans bellow show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to Climate change education or public health Explain your idea with examples 85
- Television serves many functions Watching TV makes us relax We can learn knowledge and information from TV programs Besides TV can also be seen as a companion To what extent do you agree with this 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65187713311 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25358560474 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59385665529 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6158954462 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.545454545 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393603819063 0.242375264174 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141495555942 0.0925447433944 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865885060636 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23587525363 0.151781067708 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058435375175 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.