How widely of you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause?

Essay topics:

How widely of you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause?

Recently, phenomenon of spending too much time on work than personal life has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what problems will it cause?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it does not have important effects on individual's life, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.

From the general standpoint, professional life is bound up inextricably with work environment, which indicates they lead to both full-employment and part-employment. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between working hours and average salary as well as an exponential increase in family income. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of personal life is correlated positively with not only leisure activity but also private experience.

Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, normal life attribute to non-stressful life style, in that it would come down to less depression, routine activity, and close relationship. A salient example of such attribution is seasonal jobs, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take less payment for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint economy downturn problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to playing with children, emotional shortage, and even marriage life. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of distinguishing between private and professional life.

To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the drawbacks of spending too much time on work than personal life outweigh its benefits. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...t it does not have important effects on individuals life, I will discuss controversial aspe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the general standpoint, professiona...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivity but also private experience. Within the realm of psychology, without ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een private and professional life. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 302.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73841059603 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20037694865 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672185430464 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9893368753 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.307692308 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255058192162 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728856644247 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096946285346 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155962589161 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107422472327 0.0609392437508 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.