Imagine you have been assigned to the study of climate change. Which area of climate change will you choose and why? Use examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of studying climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of vital areas are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that imaginary temperature can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the study of climate change can provide society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of efficient approaches, are considerable. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of a healthy atmosphere. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of the sustainable environment are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, climate change can supply the community with negative impacts which are associated with the reality that the demerits of increasing air pollution are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described an inefficient study. Hence, predicted outcomes of inhabitable areas are significant.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of studying climate change far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of choosing high-temperature areas prove the significance of the suitable environment, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77433628319 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35418368648 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654867256637 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0701931885 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.636363636 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219594946994 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698536496013 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066838175007 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124922121061 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175388403382 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.