the importance of cars and airplanes in modern life.give examples
Recently, the phenomenon of transportation and its corresponding impacts has sparked an ongoing debate. Some people believe that personal cars and airplanes are not essential of life than luxuries in the past. Some critics, however, claims that these innovation has developed unhealthy lifestyle. This essay will discuss both arguments with example and leads towards a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, there are many reason why airplanes and personal cars are the requirement of modern world. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that car owner can enjoy quality time with family and friend by avoiding congested crowd while driving. Moreover, a person can enjoy listening to music of his choice, it aid in carrying good and personal items. Furthermore, airplanes are the most suitable way of travelling across the world. Prime benefit of flying from one place to another has decreased the amount of travel time in convenient and cheaper way.
Nevertheless, pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that despite long-term benefits of these modes of travelling, it does come with some adverse effect for instance cars cannot replace the benefit of walk or cycling. In addition, due to high number of cars, gases from burning of fossil fuel result in environmental issues such as air pollution, life threatening diseases. The excessive emission of CO2 gas has played an important role for the breakdown of the ozone layer.
To end, cars and airplanes are one of the most creative invention and the benefit cannot be denied. Its has provided society with tons of comfort. Therefore, ideas that will bring a change for betterment are always helpful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 88 | view |
| 2020-08-19 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
| 2020-04-20 | Kanika Aggarwal | 58 | view |
| 2020-03-16 | bhattal manoj | view |
- Technological innovations have affected our lives. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanisation How far you agree 11
- Restricting air travel is the only way to prevent air pollution Do you agree 73
- “Actions Speak Louder Than Words”. Agree Or Disagree? 85
- The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. How far you agree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this innovation' or 'these innovations'?
Suggestion: this innovation; these innovations
...ast. Some critics, however, claims that these innovation has developed unhealthy lifestyle. This...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d leads towards a plausible conclusion. To begin with, there are many reason why...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'aids'?
Suggestion: aids
...oy listening to music of his choice, it aid in carrying good and personal items. Fu...
^^^
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vel time in convenient and cheaper way. Nevertheless, pivotal facet pertaining t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... replace the benefit of walk or cycling.In addition, due to high number of cars,ga...
^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , gases
....In addition, due to high number of cars,gases from burning of fossil fuel result in e...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tant role is hampering the ozone layer. To end, cars and airplanes are one of th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32075471698 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74379847042 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656603773585 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7757499845 50.4703680194 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.714285714 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.25397266985 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230856260709 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066065397143 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790078094123 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114392880106 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277796569543 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.