Information revolution brought about by modern mass media has both positive and negative consequences to individuals and society. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Discuss and use your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of corresponding impacts of the information revolution on mass communication has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the using internet for massive exchanging information in mass media is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that boosting social and scientific knowledge can be a plus. However, making wasting time on the web is the main drawback, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social and scientific standpoint, epidemic use of social media can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of mass communicating around the world, as well as using technology for acquiring the latest news and information, are inextricably bound up. Moreover, beneficial ramifications of simultaneous communications and medical advances apparently can be seen. As a tangible example, using video conference during surgeries or sending emails to transfer the latest founding about the special disease play vital roles to treat patients.
On the other hand, Excessive exposure of individuals to social media might increase the consequences of wasting time and having depression. The reason is, social websites are so addictive and as a result, the users do not have enough time to doing exercise or face-to-face communication. According to some research undertaken by UCLA, 65% of depressed patients spend more than 5 hours on social due to their sedentary lifestyle.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I believe that the benefits of information technology and mass media far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the scientific and medical improvements prove the significance of accessing the most up-to-date information in the world, but also pinpoint increasing the level of knowledge implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50333333333 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18163305378 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.3649985231 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.583333333 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187472345268 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574646083972 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434319688037 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101562789588 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235069471583 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.