It is undoubtedly that communication methods have been revolutionized due to improved information transformation techniques. Although improved communication techniques are beneficial for society as well as individuals, it can bring out negative impacts in our lives. This essay will elaborate on it further with suitable arguments and relative examples.
The positive impact is the evolution of information mediums engenders opportunities by providing a plethora of information to us. To be more specific, it can provide us with knowledge on our fingertips which can be helpful to analyze data and generate meaningful predictions from it. Apart from that, communication techniques have brought the whole world together on one single stage. Moreover, quality of life has been improved by having the information about emergencies and diseases around us.
Although information technology has been beneficial for us, it can bombard us with unwanted information and some of the data provided to us are not legitimate and trustworthy. In addition, newspapers and news channels create fake news which eventually distracts us from real life issues. Also, we can have privacy concerns while using communication mediums. To illustrate, cyberstalking and bullying are very common which even encourages people to suicide.
Overall, the information revolution has changed the world and brought drastic changes in our lives. However, there are certain negative impacts which should be taken care of while taking communication into consideration.
- the Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of living in an era in which new things are constantly being invented? 77
- Company’s top level authorities should get their employees in decision making process. Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples. 85
- Student's marks deduction on late submission of assignment. Agree or Disagree. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 109, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ombard us with unwanted information and some of the data provided to us are not legitimate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, apart from, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84140969163 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25707699095 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616740088106 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3820223491 50.4703680194 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.0 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4615384615 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130780433348 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500721665209 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454771925015 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915383366815 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369173030339 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 53.1260098522 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.