The information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication and had some negative and positive effects on individuals’ lives as well as on society.
The importance of changed the ways of mass communication which was always debatable has noe becom more controversial with many masses claming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion.The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational .This essay will further elaborate both postive and negtive effect of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myraid of reasons which will further explain the argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that, In modern era mostly people use electronic gadgets. Electronics gadgets do any work easy and correct way. it is very benefical for long distance relationship. For instance, International students easy communicate with their parents. Help of changed communication our save time ,cost. Needless to say, all these merrit stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and whch can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that some people use social media illegal ways ,like a few multitudes hack social accounts. for instance,instagram, facebook, so on. and easily cheat them.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefit of their save time and easy conversation with long distance relations are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
- sports and movies 77
- the government should require more financial support on education 55
- It is important for children to study a film a school to learn literature To what extent tou are agree or disagree 85
- whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work. 85
- investment in arts music and painting 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...eficial while others reject this notion.The substantial influence of this trend has...
^^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... proposition appears to be more rational .This essay will further elaborate both p...
^^
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...roposition appears to be more rational .This essay will further elaborate both posti...
^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...dgets do any work easy and correct way. it is very benefical for long distance rel...
^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...p of changed communication our save time ,cost. Needless to say, all these merrit ...
^^
Line 9, column 215, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ome people use social media illegal ways ,like a few multitudes hack social accoun...
^^
Line 9, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... a few multitudes hack social accounts. for instance,instagram, facebook, so on. an...
^^^
Line 9, column 273, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , instagram
...tudes hack social accounts. for instance,instagram, facebook, so on. and easily cheat them...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46090534979 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01090050562 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654320987654 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.0938366831 50.4703680194 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.076923077 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114734880504 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325759063124 0.0925447433944 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418543096556 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.060119330269 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361638198359 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.94827586207 196% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.