Involvement_of_employees_in_decision_making
Recently, the phenomenon of involving employees in the decision-making process and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of participation of junior workers is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that boosting the revenue of the company can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, involving employees in the decision-making process can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that protecting the brand, as well as improving the quality of products, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between client and employee. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both job satisfaction and creating motivation apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of loyalty among employees, participating employees in making an informed decision might increase the consequences of sharing ideas. Moreover, fundamental aspects of adding value to the company would relate to this reality that the demerits of exploiting the workers pertain to leaking the secret information of the company. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of financial problems correlated negatively with corrupted behavior. Hence, it is correct to believe that presume the preconceived notion of responsibility.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of involving employees in decision-making process far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of creativity prove the significance of popularity of the company, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-08 | amolsharma44 | 72 | view |
| 2021-11-18 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2020-04-21 | Kanika Aggarwal | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-11 | Manisha Verma | 95 | view |
| 2018-04-18 | amirnaji24 | 85 | view |
- The study of the century old dramas and plays by pupils in their student career is beneficial for understanding human development 84
- Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- With all the problems in the world today, some people think that spending money on space exploration is a complete waste. The money can be better spent on other causes. What is your opinion? 89
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher Discuss your views 82
- What is your idea of Involvement_of_employees_in_decision_making process in the company? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... but also pinpoint social implications.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79442508711 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39010244968 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630662020906 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7972585303 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.583333333 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332317072443 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109087937807 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159113010794 0.071462118173 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19722957684 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503010285006 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.