Some people say involvement of youth in crimes is increasing at an alarming rate. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of increasing of involvement of youth in crimes and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of an alarming rate is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that increasing involvement can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, increasing the rate of crime between youth can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merrits of the crime rate as well as involving in crimes are inextricabely bound up. According to my experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the role of youth in crime rates. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both ypung people and different crimes apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, involving in crimes by youth might increase the consequences of increasing at an alarming rate. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the high level of crimes could relate to this reality that the demerits of between young people pertain to an increaing number. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of being involved in crimes is correlated negatively with being younger. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this attitude.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of increasing at involvement of youth in crimes far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a high level rate prove the significance of increasing crimes, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37906137184 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12771249688 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574007220217 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0672063403 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425365938219 0.242375264174 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148508434345 0.0925447433944 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109228927319 0.071462118173 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260672040975 0.151781067708 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502218984725 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37906137184 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12771249688 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574007220217 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0672063403 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425365938219 0.242375264174 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148508434345 0.0925447433944 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109228927319 0.071462118173 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260672040975 0.151781067708 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502218984725 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.