It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? give example
Recently, the phenomenon of learning literature and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of studying different lessons is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that private schools can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the children education can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of compulsory education, as well as the learning environment, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered children developments. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both making films and learning facilities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, studying a film might increase the consequences of improving children knowledge. Moreover, fundamental aspects of educational moves could relate to this reality that demerits of the practical learning pertain to children knowledge. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of studying literature is correlated negatively with qualified kids. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of teaching methods.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the school programs far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the literature field prove the significance of children abilities, but also pinpoint the science film implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to pertain'
Suggestion: to pertain
...that demerits of the practical learning pertain to children knowledge. As a tangible ex...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74609375 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23927532993 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6484375 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1231704059 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160692461451 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525688564334 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329177362935 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880953756887 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197062065301 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.