It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, there is enduring dissension struck between people about preserving important buildings of the past and should it be vying as concrete or adverse impact on society. While the subject is plausible to retaliate that preserving old buildings will be an era in future, my panorama is that the pros outweigh the cons. In this essay, I shall make clear my point of view is by dissecting both sides of the argument.
To embark with, there is much acumen why aged building is too expensive to preserve which is well deliberate imminent a drawback in society. Consequently, its maintenance is very difficult. At the exigent plaudits, it connotes through spending more money is a waste of time. Therefore, the above reasons also are the elicits of this entity.
Even though we came transversely a set of negative things about the topic, there are people, who contend for preserving old buildings have a wide-ranging contour and enunciate that in point of fact at a substance. Furthermore, it acclaimed that if the old building is maintained then it will be an era. Moreover, it can be incorporated that it can be a tourist place for the country. However, there is anxiety around the advantages above revealed will convey and heel various eminent effectuates people from here to eternity.
Overall, this tote to an apex by a definitive of uncompromising arguments on either side of the topic; my personal Conjecture is that preserving is an old building is history. I sturdily advocate that the advantages of the subject out beat the disadvantages with no prejudice
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...preserving old buildings will be an era in future, my panorama is that the pros outweigh ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.5418719212 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04198473282 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95101116104 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606870229008 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5116927371 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.615384615 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182956839163 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560378607013 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543485135852 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100946040016 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505925172854 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 68.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.