It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that it is necessery to protect the important buildings of past. There is a widespread worry that it would only lead to myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
To commence with, there is a deluge number of arguemnts in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that thanks to old infrastructure, people can get knowledge of their tradition, rituals and living ways of kings. Not only can buildings enhance the economy of state as various visitors come to the country like foreigners and they bring foreign currency, but it can also provide emplyment opportunities to the local people which can also be helpful for economic development of nation. For instance Taj Mehal of India is a beauty of nation. needless to say, all these benefits stand nation and persons in good stead, when it comes to broadening their horizons of knowledge.
Another key justification upholding this notion is that these attractive buildings can be source of amusement and recreational activities, Jallianwala bagh in Amritsar Sahib can be cited a perfect example that is helpful in joyful activities. Another pivotal aspect that cannot be put on the backburner is that these monuments also provide the information regarding the constuction system of past time that how these buildings could be made without technology like block system of bricks. Hence, it is apparent why numeous are in favor of preserving these buildings.
To conclude, having pondered over above stated, it is crystal clear that the benefits of old buildings are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Needless
...j Mehal of India is a beauty of nation. needless to say, all these benefits stand nation...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ion regarding the constuction system of past time that how these buildings could be made ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, regarding, so, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08865248227 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87098514563 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.6297211126 50.4703680194 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123201071849 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405818113616 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344294475249 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714002036756 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386255651959 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.