It is important to preserve both the culture and environment of the places you visit, but some people think it is impossible to be responsible tourist. To what extend do you agree or diagree?
The phenomenon that it is important to preserve both the culture and environment of the places you visit created a huge controversy. Some of the people believe it is impossible to be a responsible tourist while others assert it is the responsibility of a tourist to appreciate both sides of a country. I am inclined to believe it is impossible to be a responsible tourist and this essay will discuss the problem in this respect.
The first aspect to point out is the time and budget of a tourist. One should not forget that cultural events cost more than environmental activities and this situation can limit tourist behavior. For instance, Turkey is a beloved touristic destination with its natural and historical beauties. However, most of the tourists prefer visit the seaside parts of the country which is significantly budget friendly compared to other cultural or historical occasions. The only way to deal with this issue is, governments should create policies in order to stimulate tourists attention for cultural locations.
It is understandable that an amount of people suggest it is important to appreciate and enhance the value of countries. On the other hand, it is not the duty of a tourist to preserve environmental and cultural destinations of the places they visit. The purpose of an touristic visit is usually personally entertainment and rest because most of the tourists work hard throughout the year for an enjoyable holiday.
In conclusion, I opt to vigorously support the idea that touristic behavior do not have to be responsible and tourists should only visit the places that they are really interested in.
- With the increase of digital media available online the role of the library has become obsolete Universities should only procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and giv 77
- Some universities deduct students marks if assignment is given late What is your opinion and suggest alternative actions 77
- Is experiential learning learning by doing a better approach as compared to formal education Do you agree or disagree 77
- With the increase of digital media available online the role of the library has become obsolete Universities should only procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and giv 77
- As cities expanding some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experien 55
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...s you visit created a huge controversy. Some of the people believe it is impossible to be a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...f the places they visit. The purpose of an touristic visit is usually personally e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, really, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10037174721 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05474435607 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520446096654 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3558208312 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359231553695 0.242375264174 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130842237049 0.0925447433944 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104717796566 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224697107577 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125861652337 0.0609392437508 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...s you visit created a huge controversy. Some of the people believe it is impossible to be a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...f the places they visit. The purpose of an touristic visit is usually personally e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, really, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10037174721 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05474435607 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520446096654 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3558208312 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359231553695 0.242375264174 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130842237049 0.0925447433944 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104717796566 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224697107577 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125861652337 0.0609392437508 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.