It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
recently, incompatibility between traditional culture and technology has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "will traditional culture be lost as technology develops?". Whereas it is a widely held view that technology is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the information technology standpoint, recent innovations are bound up inextricably with developed technology, which indicates they lead to both scientific research and innovative approach. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between cultural values and social norms as well as an exponential increase in knowledge. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of modern communication is correlated positively with not only new lifestyle but also economic growth.
Within the realm of socioeconomic, without the slightest doubt, heritage values attribute to oral history, in that it would come down to developed country, country's progress, and tourism sector. A salient example of such attribution is travelling, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take economy down turn for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint undeveloped community problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to parents, festivals, and even art. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of educational system and mass media.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the cultural conservation must be taken to consideration. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Recently
recently, incompatibility between traditional cu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the information technology standpoi...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ifestyle but also economic growth. Within the realm of socioeconomic, witho...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...educational system and mass media. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...research, the further we discover.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03873239437 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31479254751 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.704225352113 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.64660258 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.923076923 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220112184626 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561384209767 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940021297883 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134301780575 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146845070379 0.0609392437508 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.18 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.94827586207 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.