People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face-to-face because of technology.
What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole?
Recently, the impact of technology in people and society as a whole has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the effects of technology on individuals and society?" Whereas it is a widely held view that it is not beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, face to face communication are bound up inextricably with cash transactions, which indicates they lead to both more paper and more cutting trees. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between online shopping and preserving trees as well as an exponential increase in cardless transactions. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of banking system is correlated positively with not only bank card but also bussinuss owners.
Within the realm of international trade, without the slightest doubt, technology advancements attribute to less traffic, in that it would come down to less weather pollution, time saving, and black marketer. A salient example of such attribution is local bazaar, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take daily tasks for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint modern society problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to making money, pay check, and even bank account. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of face to face communicationnication in individuals.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that not face to face communication has not negative impacts on individuals and society. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-09 | epouei | 85 | view |
- Some people think women should be given equal chances to work and excel in their careers. Others believe that a woman’s role should be limited to taking care of the house and children. Which opinion do you agree with and why? Include specific details an 85
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons? 88
- Should people avoid over packaged products? Or is it the responsibility of manufactures? 11
- building more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? agree or disagree? 11
- What is your opinion on deducting marks on student's work if it is late? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54754098361 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26642624991 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662295081967 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7141011651 50.4703680194 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238211523064 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634344346234 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569449930734 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123498106173 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250549923134 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.94827586207 216% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.