It is often argued that studying overseas is overrated. There are many scholars who study locally. To what extend do you agree that this can effect a quality education?
Recently, the phenomenon of studying overseas and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of overrrating of studying locally is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the quality of education can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the overseas education can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of local scholars as well as high quality education are inextricabely bound up. According to my experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered increasing in overseas studying. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both local and overseas studying apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, overrating overseas studying might increase the consequences of many scholars. Moreover, fundamental aspects of good education could relate to this reality that the demerits of local studying pertain to overseas studying. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of the quality of education correlated negatively with different effects. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this attitude.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of studying in other countries far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of local education prove the significance of the quality of education, but also pinpoint the possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68897637795 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17561358938 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602362204724 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6108996476 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.416666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379752086318 0.242375264174 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122855999043 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627313724121 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212956778875 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461386923198 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.