There are both advantages and disadvantages of company workers assessing their own products and services. Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of assessing the products and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of workers is highly beneficial, such issue is regarding thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantail number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the company's employees can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, assessing services can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of high- quality productions as well as the quality control are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered top-level companies. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both the increasing and rising the consumers' satisfaction apparantly can be seen.
Within the realm of science, checking the quality might increase the consequences of industrial improvements. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of labours could relate to this reality that the demerits of successful factories pertain to a large number of production. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of the workforces is correlated negatively with being the best one in marketing.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of assessing their own products far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of commercial competitions prove the significance of the goods, but also financial implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...s of both the increasing and rising the consumers satisfaction apparantly can be seen. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rits of successful factories pertain to a large number of production. As a tangible example, some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69547325103 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27577703282 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658436213992 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6578141473 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.818181818 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210387348765 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583895402391 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636002313722 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110998204666 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076457593397 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.