Television serves many functions. Watching TV makes us relax. We can gain knowledge and information from TV programs. Besides, TV can also be seen as a companion. To what extent do you agree with this? Explain it with your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of watching TV and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of functional points is highly beneficial, such issue is regarding thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that obtaining useful information can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, watching TV programs can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of increasing general knowledge as well as basic information are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discoverd a real companion. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both the leisure time and hobbies apparently can be seen.
Whitin the realm of science, spending time at the front of TV might increase the consequences of educationa programs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of children's interests could relate to this reality that the demerits of favourit movies pertain to adults. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of being relax is correlated negatively with enjoying humans' lives. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of different tasts.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of observing TV series far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being alone at home prove the significance of strong attitudes, but also pinpoint the remarkable implicattions
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-09-21 | Yuli | 88 | view |
2022-09-21 | Yuli | 80 | view |
2021-11-01 | sagar2021 | 55 | view |
2021-09-23 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
2021-01-17 | Sandeep Mazwar | 55 | view |
- Do you think students who go to university and pay full fees should earn higher salaries than those who do not go to university 85
- Television serves many functions Watching TV makes us relax We can gain knowledge and information from TV programs Besides TV can also be seen as a companion To what extent do you agree with this Explain it with your own experience 85
- Schools should prepare students for university rather than for work To what extent do you agree with this statement 85
- There are both problems and benefits for high school students to study plays and works of theatres written centuries ago Discuss and use your own experience 80
- Should there be a maximum wage for highly paid people Is it good or bad 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54296875 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16721245596 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6796875 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3686419545 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289760396295 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077093481147 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532352893324 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145141719619 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654700144276 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.