Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Your opinion- good or bad

In this day and age, small shops are giving up their own place to shopping centers. Although replacing small shops with malls regarded as thoroughly constructive and benefit for industries and consumers, there is an opposing viewpoint with this changing. For the purpose of this essay, I would discuss how far advantages of this replacing are.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support developing malls in every town and city. At first, although shopping centers can not to be placed in every district and close to your house but, this weakness has covered by cheaper products and diverse products very well. For example, I can buy all of my needs in the local shop center and I do not need to go anywhere for purchasing. In fact, it is saving time for me.
Secondly, by this changing producers and companies will try to save their own position and window in these malls. This can make a competitive advantage among different industries. Some small producers maybe do not able remain in this competition but products of better quality will be accessible. A recent scientific conducted with Tehran University researchers in 2016 shows promoting shopping centers caused by increasing quality of most yields.
In conclusion, the benefits of replacing large shopping malls with small shops are far outweighed of their drawbacks such as price reduction, saving time and creating the competitive advantage as well.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this day and age, small shops are giv...
^^^^
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w far advantages of this replacing are. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng. In fact, it is saving time for me. Secondly, by this changing producers and...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by increasing quality of most yields. In conclusion, the benefits of replacing...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 5.94088669951 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08974358974 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70823197268 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606837606838 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7030018855 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198518715692 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706252800964 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734507963365 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139069605824 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812552686664 0.0609392437508 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.