These days, there is an ongoing debate among people about tourism and if it has developed significantly in the last decade in less developed countries. While it is possible to claim that tourism generates foreign currency, my view is that disadvantages outweigh advantages. In this essay, I shall explain both sides of the argument.
There are several reasons why tourism is considered to be disadvantageous to less developed countries. One of them is that the development process a country needs to undergo. It is also argued that the cost of development goes out of taxpayers money. It should also be taken in to account that more lands will be acquired by the government and people will need to move out; however, they will be compensated. For an example, if a family is asked to move out due to a town planning proposal, it may be devastating news for them as they will have to relocate to somewhere where they do not want.
Those who argue for tourism has developed significantly have a different view and say that it actually can be a good thing. Firstly, it is claimed that tourism creates more jobs. Then, there are concerns about the security of local businesses.
While there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that the development of tourism in less developed countries brought disadvantages. I would strongly recommend that the government should be more considerate about people before making plans to promote tourism.
These days, there is an
These days, there is an ongoing debate among people about tourism and if it has developed significantly in the last decade in less developed countries. While it is possible to claim that tourism generates foreign currency, my view is that disadvantages outweigh advantages. In this essay, I shall explain both sides of the argument.
There are several reasons why tourism is considered to be disadvantageous to less developed countries. One of them is that the development process a country needs to undergo. After analysing an article published on tourism, I understand that the cost of development goes out of taxpayers money. Because tourism helps to generate foreign currency, local authorities do not tend to interfere even if there are significant impacts to society. Despite the fact of providing support to people with better relocation plans, the government may acquire lands and people may need to move out; however, they will be compensated. For an example, if a family is asked to move out due to a town planning proposal, it may be devastating news for them as they will have to relocate to somewhere where they do not want.
Those who argue for tourism has developed significantly have a different view and say that it actually can be a good thing. Firstly, it claimed that tourism creates more jobs. Then, there are concerns about the security of local businesses.
While there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that the development of tourism in less developed countries brought disadvantages. I would strongly recommend that the government should intervene and be more considerate about people before planning to promote tourism. Let's think positively, and pray for the government to do the right thing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that the development of tourism in l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95967741935 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86924558714 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552419354839 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.6157635468 238% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6696405522 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6153846154 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340887326955 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128720101544 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135605941588 0.071462118173 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22241756656 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983216240183 0.0609392437508 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.