Life experience is a better teacher than school or foreign education. Give an example and support opinion.
Recently the phenomenon of experiencing new things through life and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that learning by academic methods could be a plus, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial numbers of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that both formal education and practical learning have fundamental roles in everyone's life and this essay will examine both sides of this view by providing some academic evidence before conclusions.
From an education standpoint, academic learning can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that theoretical education and keeping up with the advancement technology are extremely bound up. From my own experience, when I was a college students, I participated in an academic survey which resulting in the fact that most of the successful scientists were came from a well-educated family. Not to mention that having an academic qualification could help students to find a better opportunities in their forthcoming life. Thus, beneficial ramification of both formal education and educational achievement apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, some opponent tend to believe that gaining knowledge just by participating in college or foreign courses is not sufficiently enough. They tend to believe that work experience as well as practical education could provide a good source of knowledge for the learners. Furthermore, according to an academic research conducted by a prestigious institute, experimental learning could broaden students’ view among some hidden aspects of life.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although some opponents tend to believe that students just need formal education to become a successful person, I strongly tend to believe that beside foreign education, practical learning methods and gaining some experience could prepares students for unknown future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | a.aghyi1989 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | a.aghyi1989 | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Nasir-RZN | 88 | view |
| 2019-04-10 | mohab.elhaddad | 77 | view |
- In the past 100 years, there have been many inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes and computers. What do you think is the most important of them? Why? 80
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 85
- In the most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it s a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 85
- The ability to learn more than one languages will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Is individuals' personality affected by nurture and teaching, or genetics is more important? Give your opinion. Support your reasons with examples. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 389, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...formal education and practical learning have fundamental roles in everyones life and...
^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
... most of the successful scientists were came from a well-educated family. Not to men...
^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'prepare'
Suggestion: prepare
...thods and gaining some experience could prepares students for unknown future.
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... prepares students for unknown future.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72727272727 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16334222093 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.889046717 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.636363636 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0996202610186 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415546963703 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341263298885 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628230735974 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171941449797 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.