Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression for the company. To what extent do you agree or disgree?
Nowadays, many organizations involve employees in decision-making, which has attracted many controversies and drawn attention from the public. Some people agree that employees are productive assets of the company, while on the other hand, stands a perspective that companies should not involve employees in crucial decisions. This essay will elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are various reasons why employees are important for the decision-making process. The most conspicuous one stems from the fact that employees provide inputs which are necessary for rectifying the shortcomings and irregularities in the internal processes. It reduces the hindrances in the growth process of the organizations. Moreover, when an employee participates in major decisions, it adds value to them and motivates them to work harder. Thus, it shows that involving employees in decision-making increases efficiency in the processes and leads to effective management.
Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of employees in decisions and the most alarming one roots from the fact that employees, sometimes sell the confidential information of the company. For instance, employees pass the sensitive information to the rivals and pose a threat to its reputation. Hence, employee’s participation in decision-making leads to negative consequences and thus, should be restricted.
In the light of the above discussion, one can conclude that organizations should consider its employees in the decision-making process as they work towards its success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess as they work towards its success.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8755186722 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4660295226 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576763485477 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2098925195 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290877791599 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103955084597 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07517023142 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166928149991 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576558654435 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.