Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of involving employees in decision-making policy and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe Some people thinking that the decision-making policy is important for the progression of the company can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, making policy can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, decision-making policy might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-11 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Armidat | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Armidat | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Armidat | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-13 | sara malla | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77922077922 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39894938995 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649350649351 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7438479547 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414456470545 0.242375264174 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16197034436 0.0925447433944 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182630116149 0.071462118173 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338486403345 0.151781067708 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.392418050289 0.0609392437508 644% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.