Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The importance of many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat birds, cat, or other animals as member of their family what was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that many people,s are closely relations such as pets and many other kind of animals.For example indian people alway relation with pets one of the biggest reason home security, and many other kind of activity use pets. Needless to say all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that some people are relationship with dangerous dogs like american bully, and other kinds. Hence it is apparent why many are against this trend.
To conclusion, according to the arguments aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of close relationship with there pets .
- Some people think technology helps us save time but others believe wastes our time. 55
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones. 77
- in other countries 77
- small shops 72
- The world s governments and organization are facing a lot of issues 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative ef...
^^
Line 1, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this tr...
^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...one stems from the fact that many people,s are closely relations such as pets and ...
^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... as pets and many other kind of animals.For example indian people alway relation wi...
^^^
Line 9, column 262, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...s like american bully, and other kinds. Hence it is apparent why many are against thi...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ts of close relationship with there pets .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, so, thus, while, for example, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16814159292 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61025018786 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575221238938 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.6507828894 50.4703680194 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.777777778 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312973329763 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13635981448 0.0925447433944 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136314123614 0.071462118173 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167670395591 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706503855726 0.0609392437508 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.