Many people think that regions affect a successful person. What is your opinion about the native region and accomplished person’s influence on the region he belongs to?
Recently, the phenomenon of regions’ role on flourishing people and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of native land is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that an expert person can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the impact of professionals on his regions can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of lucrative people, as well as national area, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the interaction between a lucrative person and equipped regions. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the role of an efficient man and the sense of belonging to his country apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, regions can influence on the prosperity of their inhabitant might increase the consequences of the nurturing their talent. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of providing opportunities could relate to this reality that the demerits of unsuccessful persons pertain to the lack of equipment. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of failure is correlated negatively with inattention. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of men’s achievement.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the region’s concerns on their people far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of blossoming their abilities prove the significance of the correspondence between persons and their homes, but also pinpoint the practical people implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | bashirheidari | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-26 | cur_zii | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-04 | hchandra | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | Android | 55 | view |
- Students can obtain information of academic subject from online the printed books and articles and discussion with their teachers and their peers Which one is the most reliable source 85
- People should take part in sports either in individual or in teams because people can learn many useful skills How far do you agree Explain and use examples or your own experience 88
- People dispute travel is or is not a component of quality education Some believe travel is overrated What is your opinion 77
- Some people are always in a hurry to get somewhere and get things done Others prefer to take their time and live a slow paced life Will you prefer the slow paced life and why 88
- Space travel is fantastic these days but there are many issues such as environmental problems that we should be focusing on What are your views on the allocation of public funding 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56462585034 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30180318904 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8297592539 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.333333333 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21021652281 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648819196604 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425772857585 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120793015224 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304109482819 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.