Many sports stars earn an enormous amount of money. Some people think that this is fair because these people are talented.Others, however, believe that a person's salary should be based on his/her contribution to society.
Do you think the sports stars deserve the money they earn?. Support our point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observation.
Currently, the top earning professionals around the world are from the sports industry. While some people think that the sports stars should be paid based on their talent, others believe that their salary should be decided based on their contribution activities in the society. This essay will discuss why the sports stars deserve to be paid with a salary according to their talent.
Generally, when sports stars earn salary according to their talent, it increases their motivation to perform better. And when they perform better, it is vital for the nation as the whole. For example, cricket stars in the country of India are graded and provided with the salary according to their talent which has helped the cricket industry to perform better. Hence, salaries of the sports personalities are considered as a motivating factor which helps to increase their talent to a greater extent.
Also, it is not fair to pay any sports personality based on his/her social activities. This is because any person from any other field can perform the social activities. This can be an extra activity which a sports person can perform and it is solely according to his/her wish. Hence, it would not be a correct amount of payment if the sports stars are paid based on their social acts.
Overall, this essay discussed how the sports stars are motivated based on the payment for their talent and why it is unfair to pay them based on their social contribution.In my opinion, the sports stars are certainly eligible for the payment they earn based on the talent they show on the field.
- Does the advent of internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree? 70
- Television has two roles to inform and entertain Explain which of these roles you see as important To what extent do you think that TV today performs these roles in an effective way Support your point of view with observations or examples 85
- Cheap overseas travel does more good than bad.To what extent do you agree? 72
- Most artists earn low salary and should, therefore, receive social welfare amount from the governments in order to continue working on their skill.Discuss to what extent you agree or disagree with examples or observations. 55
- Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...essionals around the world are from the sports industry. While some people think that ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...xtent. Also, it is not fair to pay any sports personality based on his/her social act...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
.... This can be an extra activity which a sports person can perform and it is solely acc...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...them based on their social contribution.In my opinion, the sports stars are certai...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89138576779 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46504551319 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 139.433497537 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449438202247 0.580463131201 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7267902623 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.833333333 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321025469745 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134599915639 0.0925447433944 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829577565571 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209087315767 0.151781067708 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867566117894 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.