Many young people nowadays are imitating celebrities in sports and movies. In your opinion, is this good or bad? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.

Recently, the phenomenon of the imitating celebrities in sports and movies, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that mimicking of successful people is highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of people. I am inclined to believe that simulating the stars in sport and movies cannot be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to dismiss the mimicking of celebrities by the young people. At first, the act of choosing a pattern in the life can be an advantage for everyone to become successful. However, the superstars are not good for simulation. For example, with a little study of celebrities such as superstars in movies, you will find many of them addicted to cigarette or drugs.
In addition, there are many people that can be a good pattern for the young people such as famous scientists and inventors. But, the sport celebrities reputed just by sport that is possible for all people. The young people should imitate the style of scientists' life such as Edison to prosper their gold.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments about imitating the living style of celebrities, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of this simulation are far outweighed its benefits.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of the imitatin...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f them addicted to cigarette or drugs. In addition, there are many people that ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... such as Edison to prosper their gold. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12107623318 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92279000987 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 139.433497537 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551569506726 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5022191005 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.818181818 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202222000294 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783469067134 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430483188828 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114339745018 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443906213403 0.0609392437508 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.