Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts, and in what ways this can impact on their reputation?
Recently, the phenomenon of marketing strategies and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of multinational companies' reputations is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that discount campaigns can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, famous companies' marketing strategies can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of discounted products, as well as price offers, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between companies reputation impacts and marketing researches. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both trading offers and well-known strategies apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, wrong marketing approaches might increase the consequences of unforeseen reputational impacts. Moreover, fundamental aspects of highly-educated marketers could relate to this reality that the demerits of company's reputation growth pertain to advance marketing methods. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of negative reputations is correlated negatively with bad marketing policies. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of mature marketing decisions.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of global marketing trends far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of positive international impacts prove the significance of well-established strategies, but also pinpoint financial reputations implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05204460967 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39581260299 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665427509294 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1866123905 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283500497914 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935925866336 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418581096488 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155641144949 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534016586351 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.11 11.5310837438 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.24 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.