The means of communicating in society today has changed greatly over the last ten years. Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of the meaning of communicating and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debates. Although contested by many that the matter of changing in communicating's meaning in society is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that changing greatly over the last ten years can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the communicating's meaning can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of great changing recently as well as the today society are inextricabely bound up. According to my experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these wonderful changes in a modern society. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both communities and societies are apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the means of communicating might increase the consequences of the last ten years. Moreover, fundamental aspects of modern changes relate to this reality that the demerits of this opinion pertain to different communities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of remarkable changes correlated negatively with recent years. Hecne, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this attitude.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of up-to-date communities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of recent changes prove the significance of a modern society, but also pinpoint great implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'debate'?
Suggestion: debate
...responding impacts has sparked a heated debates. Although contested by many that the ma...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59315589354 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26588303383 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608365019011 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8702881322 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339926939423 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100986250425 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849020548999 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178288931018 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917199980029 0.0609392437508 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.