The importance of medical technology, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of improvement in medical technology has sparked the controversy over the potential impact on human's life expectancy in recent years. In my opinion, the increase in human's life expectancy is due to the improvement in medical technology, while others may disagree with this opinion. This essay will elaborate my opinion in greater details and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons how medical technology has improved the human's life expectancy, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that diseases that were incurable in the past, has cure for them now. For instance, diseases like typhoid and malaria did not have any cure in the past. As a result, many people died because of these diseases. However, with improvement in medical technologies, cure for those diseases were found and number of fatalities dropped significantly. Hence, improvement in medical technologies have improved the human's life expectancy.
Another key justification to uphold this notion is that, with the improvement in medical technology, operations that were impossible in the past are possible now. Moreover, doctors know more about our body than they ever did. With these improved technology, they accurately diagnose the diseases and carry out the necessary steps, with little trouble to the patients. Thus, these advancement in technologies have save a lot of lives.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that improvement in medical technology is one of the key factors in improvement in human's life expectancy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ontroversy over the potential impact on humans life expectancy in recent years. In my ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...how medical technology has improved the humans life expectancy, but the most conspicuo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'cured'.
Suggestion: cured
...es that were incurable in the past, has cure for them now. For instance, diseases li...
^^^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... medical technologies have improved the humans life expectancy. Another key justifi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this advancement' or 'these advancements'?
Suggestion: this advancement; these advancements
...h little trouble to the patients. Thus, these advancement in technologies have save a lot of live...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'saved'.
Suggestion: saved
... these advancement in technologies have save a lot of lives. From what has been d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42264150943 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98566648224 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569811320755 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2598116365 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.642857143 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234804928048 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870680155377 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866486968026 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156185046118 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745627123269 0.0609392437508 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.