Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of medical technology and its corresponding impacts has sparked a debated heat. Although contested by many that the emergency medication is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using more the hospital treatment can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, human’s life expectancy can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the advanced technology, as well as a healthy lifestyle, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic survey which discovered the preventive medicines and a longer lifespan. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both a physical well-being and an innovative technology in the best way apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of personal considerations, taking responsibility for life might increase the consequences of human’s immune systems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of individual’s life insurance relate to this reality that the demerits medical practitioner pertain to widespread diseases. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by Yale University has asserted that the downside of the wrong drug is correlated negatively with the people’s illness. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the Medicare facilities.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of medical advanced innovations far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of complex technology prove the significance of health care system, but also pinpoint the prescribed medications implications.
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, what are the positive and negative impact on life and work. 88
- Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Cashless society 88
- Whether design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? give your opinion. 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, what are the positive and negative impact on life and work. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83271375465 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43287164495 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672862453532 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8216421868 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206411942316 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630507067856 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605958035958 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106243653798 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479601365832 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.3 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.