The medical technology is responsible for increasing the average life expectancy. Do you think it is a curse or a blessing?
Medical technology is a powerful weapon which you use it for extend the average life expectancy of the people. One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is that whether medical advancement is of paramount importance by increasing the average life expectancy among people or it creates trouble among them. As such, there are both merits and demerits due to these advancements, although I am inclined to believe that it benefits the people by introducing new advancements to cut risks of death as described below.
There are some arguments to support my stance, but most preponderant one is that due to medical advancements, it cuts risks of death by preventing important diseases like cancer and stroke. Not only, it helps in increasing average life expectancy, but also helps in living longer with happiness both mentally and physically. For example, cancer, which was believed to be uncured earlier, now can be cured through penicillin injection, which is possible only via this medical advancements, researcher claimed. Needless to say, all these benefits stand in increasing the longevity life as far as focusing on health conscious and living peacefully is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that lots of old aged people benefit by these technology. Primarily, during their retirement period, they face some amount of diseases such as Asthma, eyesore and nerve issue. All these issues is possible to cure nowadays by providing consistent treatment, which was not possible during their earlier period. As a result, it increases their average life expectancy than before. Hence, it is clear why many people support against this advancements.
To sum up, considering all insights discussed above that relates to blessing of medical technology, it plays an integral role in enhancing the average life expectancy, which is really great merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'these technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; these technologies
...that lots of old aged people benefit by these technology. Primarily, during their retirement per...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 473, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s clear why many people support against this advancements. To sum up, consider...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, really, so, for example, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38383838384 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8895951669 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8606211123 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236861104093 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846388836356 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920780393459 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146446785889 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582849482131 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.