The medical technology is responsible for increasing the average life expectancy. Do you think it is a curse or a blessing?
The importance of using medical technology, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substance influence of medical technology is increasing the average life expectancy has sparked controversy over the potential impact of the whole society in recent years. It can be agreed that using medical technology plays a vital role, although it has drawbacks. This essay will elaborate on how medical technology can facilitate the development of science-related field and how medical technology can result in a huge financial burden on family’s financial situation, and then will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why medical technology brings a lot of benefits for society, but the most conspicuous one stems os that the medical technology can facilitate the development of science-related field. As an illustration, research has invariably revealed that diabetes prevalence in Japan has dramatically decreased four times compared with using traditional medicine after diabetes medical technology has been introduced to five noted hospitals in Tokyo. Therefore, governments should use medical technology more frequently in the medical industry.
Nevertheless, some people adopt to an opposing view to believe that medical technology also has some disadvantages as there are innumerable reasons for that but the most salient one is that medical technology will result in a huge financial burden on the family’s financial situation. For instance, John’s father had a serious heart problem and he needs to use a new technical pacemaker to sustain his life. John spent over thirty thousand dollars to purchase this medical device, which directly causes a financial burden for his whole family. Thus, using medical technology will result in financial problems for people.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of using medical technology in society is prominent, although the financial burden of people should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
... industry. Nevertheless, some people adopt to an opposing view to believe that medica...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 309.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64401294498 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10851826595 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53074433657 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 379.143842365 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.76894132 50.4703680194 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.333333333 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233966178458 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105235551738 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478561887217 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147947842742 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518643785745 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.