In this modern world, Numerous people who are working has to relocate with their families from their native places to other cities leaving behind their parents. It is generally believed that as grandchildren and grandparents spend less time with each other has both positive and negative effects. This contentious topic has been profoundly debated in several forums. I will elucidate the pertinent reason for causes and solutions meticulously before inclining towards a rational conclusion.
Throwing light on causes, I feel rarely meeting between grandparents and grandchildren will result to loss of tradition of their history as children already prefer meticulous life style instead understanding their culture. Mostly working parents are not able to spend more time with family which results children stops giving important to family. Moreover, A children who spend more time on internet-based entertainment instead spending time with grandparents will not get chance to look their culture closely.
Paradoxically, an adolescence who explores the world with his own experience has more chance to succeed because they easily face tough situations in their life. Grandparents teach them same ancient techniques those are not working any more in this 21st century. In my perception, grand parents should not impose only their own thinking to grandchildren instead also try to change themselves to according to new generation.
I conclude that communication gap between two generations leads to loss of cultural values but it also helps a new generation to learn new methods to live life and helps to become successful in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: A child; Children
...s giving important to family. Moreover, A children who spend more time on internet-based e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, as to, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5219123506 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94882086861 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641434262948 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2092022139 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255053350805 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908204865509 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645952055454 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135349150675 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876730233649 0.0609392437508 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.