More and more women are raising a family with a career. Please give your opinions and suggestions about this challenge on a personal level and a national level.
Recently, the phenomenon of raising a family with a career by women and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of this challenge is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that different levels can be a plus and I will discuss that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the role of women in raising a family with a job can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of a personal level as well as a national level are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered family members. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both jobs and ladies apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, bringing up the family with careers might increase the consequences of women's levels. Moreover, fundamental aspects of different opinions relate to this reality that the demerits of some suggestions pertain to challenges. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of personal levels is correlated negatively with national levels. Hence, it is correct to persume the preconceived notion of this attitude.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of increasing a family's level with a career by a woman far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of big challenges prove the significance of the importance of personal levels but also pinpoint the remarkable implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34317343173 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15007278731 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59778597786 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.616957523 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352574689271 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107784432421 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679809165929 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200027577309 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166998758381 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.