More and more women are raising a family with a career. Please give your opinions on a personal level and a national level.
Recently, the phenomenon of increasing the number of working women and mothers and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of full-time caring of family members is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded as thoroughly constructive by some people. I am inclined to believe that working moms as role models can be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From my standpoint, bringing up children by employed mothers can provide the family with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of raising independent children, as well as having fortunate family, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, as a mother and an employee, there is a powerful relationship between financial independence and life satisfaction. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both strong family bonds and happy moms apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of society, Expand the presence of working women despite their responsibilities at home could increase the consequences of boosting communication for collaborative work. Women are endowed with strong networking skills using which they can encourage any group work efforts. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by UCLA university has asserted that the poor team-work in companies is correlated with weakness in verbal and emotional skills. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the strong team spirit by women attendance.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of balancing between the house-chores and work responsibilities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of raising powerful family prove the significance of self-sufficient mothers, but also improve the quality of the company's work as a team implication.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52068965517 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21123362636 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641379310345 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2943306484 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.416666667 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0870426125437 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0309815100007 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.02221221659 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0495270849643 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133166036097 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.