Pop music should have a university degree. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of having a pop university degree and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of popular music is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that considering as an academic subject can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, just listening to pop music as an art can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of ear-catching songs, as well as exciting music, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered a shallow view of popular music. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both enjoying contemporary melodies and funny and cool lyrics apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of art, studying every kind of music such as pop might increase the consequences of inspiration songs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of permanent melodies could relate to this reality that the demerits of ignoring the depth of art pertaining to insufficient studies. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by UCLA University has asserted that the downside of lasting artwork is correlated negatively with learning the history of art in universities. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of understanding the concept of pop melodies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of establishing popular music as an academic field far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of art education prove the significance of sophisticated artists, but also pinpoint meaningful songs implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44482758621 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23051922436 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634482758621 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6704304937 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.583333333 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180106201987 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594845304188 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597690597809 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988602005958 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301624531836 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.