More information available online so library books are useless, agree or disagree with statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of available online information and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of internet based e-book libraries are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that modern library systems can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, many public libraries can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of book reading software, as well as modern searching methods, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered abounded library followed by widely online information sources. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both E-books publishers and digital edition apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, bad quality printed books might increase the consequences of paper usage. Moreover, fundamental aspects of useless books would relate to this reality that the demerits of non-recyclable papers pertain to hardcover books. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of publication deficiency problem is correlated negatively with unreliable newspaper facts. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of useless information.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of online research far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of book references prove the significance of reliable data, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77735849057 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15856044647 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68679245283 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2287577177 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.583333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218874767162 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658612941408 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325405646129 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113262565085 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367547174113 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.34 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.