Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change
Recently, the modern communication has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the positive and negative impacts of changing in communication?". Whereas it is a widely held view that new communication methods don't have benefit impact on individual, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the information technology standpoint, communication methods are bound up inextricably with innovative investigation, which indicates they lead to both convenience and easier ways. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between social networks and saving time as well as an exponential increase in performance workers. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of internet is correlated positively with not only broadband connection but also easy access.
Within the realm of psychological, without the slightest doubt, modern civilization attribute to less time, in that it would come down to more anxious, tense, and depression. A salient example of such attribution is Facebook, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take mental health for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint remote communication problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to anxious, tense, and even depression. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of E-mail and internet access.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of modern communication outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eld view that new communication methods dont have benefit impact on individual, I wi...
^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92957746479 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38932914793 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679577464789 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3306772018 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.538461538 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14228416413 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395995004185 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711577735065 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902778236384 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116699897502 0.0609392437508 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.