more information available online so library books useless?

Essay topics:

more information available online so library books useless?

Recently, the phenomenon of being library books information online and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of online learning is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and downloading positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the role of useless library books online can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the major of online library books can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that strong networks, As well as online news, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the effect of online available information might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the advantages of online library books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-06 SATHISH KUMAR B 77 view
2021-03-17 LAKSHMINARAYANBABA 77 view
2020-06-16 Shashank7976 80 view
2020-05-29 manraj123 77 view
2020-01-29 MehdiKhodadadi 85 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62055335968 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16782083073 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648221343874 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9842494955 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.272727273 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264237184793 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895031261418 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939816581114 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1429199591 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731773890957 0.0609392437508 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.