What is the most significant invention to last 100 years; the computer, medicines, the airplane, and explain
why? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own
knowledge or experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of the significant invention and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that inventions are highly challenging, such issue is regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that computers should be considered as a revolutionary invention, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the device standpoint, computers provide some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the airplane, as well as medicines, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered more creation. Hence, the beneficial ramifications of computers can be observed.
Within the realm of the technological advancement, the excess using of computers might exacerbate the consequences of being too reliant on technology. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of poor eyesight relate to the reality that the demerits of putting the strain on eyes pertain to staring at the screens. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the severe health problems are correlated negatively with sitting in front of the computers for a long time. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of adverse effects of high technology.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I tend to profoundly believe that computers are the most remarkable invention in the contemporary world in comparison with another advancement, but it is recommended that it should be used under proper guidance and supervision to diminish its detrimental effects on people's health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60447761194 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.308285635 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638059701493 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1844515205 50.4703680194 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.545454545 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0688627673273 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227890573061 0.0925447433944 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261030882626 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0398609191776 0.151781067708 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186131961851 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.