In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons.
Recently, the phenomenon of education systems and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by mant that the matter of complex prcedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that students assessments can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, assessing written examinations can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in fact that lecture placement, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own exprience, when I was a university student, I preformed an academic experiment which discoverd education methods. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both examination systems and effective education systems appaerantly can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, oral examination might increase the consequences of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a perstigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with students activities. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of students behavior.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the beneficial of assessing assignments far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of cognitive skills prove the significane of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ective education systems appaerantly can be seen. Within the realm of a public ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8652173913 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29363538153 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691304347826 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5189708799 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.636363636 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116705601089 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394195072556 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235333930836 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619494338916 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173678237712 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.