“My education is the Hindrance of the process of my Learning” – Einstein
The discussion on how education limits the process of student learning is debatable and each side has it logical argument. I incline to believe that traditional education is only benefit to individual to acquire more knowledge in the future. This essay will elucidate some reasons why education is more rational.
On one hand critics may point out that students spend too much time for their education and it is limit them some wide range of creativities. For instance, many high tech and powerful people in the world are not graduated from their university but they can invent world class leading technology. This can prove that education is not really help students in enhancing their learning.
However, in spite of a few eminent people that succeed without proper education, education is still the only wise choice for normal people path to acquire knowledge for their future in this competitive working society. Students who have expose to laboratory study and school assignment are ready to go further in creating new invention and overhaul the existing invention. For example, computer was a big bulky machine in last 20 years but it has become more compact due the advent of new technology that people have made. Education is the mechanism for students to learning the traditional theory which is undoubtedly correct and they can further discovery new idea afterward.
Lastly, since education is long process of learning, students are not only learning new knowledge but they are also become a better citizen in our society. Therefore, in my opinion, education doesn’t limit individual learning in any respect.
To conclude, some famous people might think education is not vital important to them but in fact it will prepare students to be a knowledgeable person and creative in their future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 238, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'exposed'.
Suggestion: exposed
...tive working society. Students who have expose to laboratory study and school assignme...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 323, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ent are ready to go further in creating new invention and overhaul the existing invention. Fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, lastly, may, really, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19727891156 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70618366936 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56462585034 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8043186763 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.538461538 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168948354494 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698561385489 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811098982583 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109685788568 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980237743532 0.0609392437508 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.