n a cashless society people use more credit cards instead of cash Cashless society seems to be a reality How realistic do you think it might be What are the benefits and problems of this phenomenon

Essay topics:

n a cashless society, people use more credit cards instead of cash. Cashless society seems to be a reality. How realistic do you think it might be? What are the benefits and problems of this phenomenon?

Recently, the phenomenon of a cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of using cash is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a cashless system can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, cashless payment can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of reducing crime, as well as decreasing tax evasion, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experiment, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered privacy. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both being portable and high security apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, cash payment might increase the consequences of crime. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of disease transmission could relate to this reality that the demerits of unnecessary purchase pertain to the temptation of overspending. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of low security is correlated negatively with lack of privacy. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of credit purchase.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of credit card use far outweigh its drawbacks, Not only do the advantages of high standards prove the significance of online shopping, but also pinpoint crime prevention implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49411764706 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1965234864 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662745098039 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4924237975 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.363636364 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225668107867 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700071474915 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506211828763 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116043245192 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494856381836 0.0609392437508 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.