“Normal” societal roles for women include taking care of the children in the household. But now that women contribute equally in outdoor responsibilities, it would be a little unfair to expect the same amount of dedication towards the upbringing of the children.
Is it okay for men to participate and share the responsibilities of the house and make their presence be felt more in their children's life, or should the mothers be solely responsible?
Now a day, women are getting education and they are ready to work with men. However, they cannot give same amount of time for upbringing of the children. Should this responsibility be shared with men or the women solely responsible for the upbringing of the child? In this essay I will give my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.
The God has created human; men and women. Both have different structure, capabilities and temperament. So, it will be unfair to put all the outdoor responsibility on women. Outdoor responsibility does not mean only to sit in the office, but there are other tasks which needs physically strong person, men are strong than women. For instance, in the field of civil engineering, petroleum engineering where employees are working away from home for six months. Similarly, if all the responsibilities cannot be taken by women, men cannot take all the responsibility of upbringing of the children. Because of the way God has created men.
The women have more affection for their children compared to men. God has put material of love in women more than men. Father cannot give pure love and affection to his children compared to their mother. However, men can participate and share the responsibilities of the house. For instance, husband can help in the kitchen, grocery and preparation of food which really helps the women.
In conclusion, upbringing of the children is shared responsibility. No one can get rid of it. The child wants affection from both of the parents. Hence, balance of responsibilities between men and women is highly appreciated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-23 | Ammu helen | 62 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Sridarani | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Rohit mahajan | 55 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | Kushi | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | notawriter | 55 | view |
- Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion? 55
- Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them? 55
- Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion? 55
- Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion? 55
- Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sibility of upbringing of the children. Because of the way God has created men. The ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, really, similarly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01872659176 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02722755412 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6551724138 158% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6509953906 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.0 104.977214359 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.35 20.9669160288 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.25397266985 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200327093902 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674219512016 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571519005325 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130303289891 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389265722538 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 12.6369458128 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.32886699507 85% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 64.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.