Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion?
These days, there is an ongoing debate between people that large shopping malls are replacing local shops which are threat to these small shops and bad for local economies. While it is possible to claim that large shopping malls are threating the local shops, my view is that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.
There are several reasons why there is a need for large shopping malls. One of them is that all the household items are available in one place. Hence, the time of customers is saved as they do not need to find and travel for each item separately. It can also be argued that it is not mandatory that large shopping malls are from different countries. Usually, it happens people invest in large malls so that all type of products is available in one place. It should be taken into account that main thing to benefit the local economy is that the product which is placed in the large mall is locally produced. If the local shops which are selling a branded product then there is no difference in selling that product by shopping malls or local shops.
Those who argue that local shops should exist have a different view. Firstly, the malls are overcrowded on weekends and holidays. Sometimes it seems that everyone has same idea and go to mall. The corridors and crowded stores make shopping very difficult, people often end up forgetting the items they need to buy. Consequently, aged people with mobility problems may have difficulty passing through the shopping center.
While there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that bid shopping mall is not threat to local shops and the local economy. There is need for both shopping malls and small local shops as they are main ingredient to local economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | emchawia | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | daniellima126 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Kushi | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-29 | Sekhonsaab221@gmail.com | 75 | view |
- Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion? 77
- Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion? 55
- Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them? 55
- Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them? 55
- Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that bid shopping mall is not threat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 10.5418719212 256% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 5.94088669951 286% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 322.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76086956522 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3691093071 2.71678728327 87% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493788819876 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4396568711 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1764705882 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.25397266985 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.520852509833 0.242375264174 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169260903873 0.0925447433944 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141380511225 0.071462118173 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343391074524 0.151781067708 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894326911657 0.0609392437508 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 12.6369458128 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.5310837438 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.32886699507 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.