It is irrefutable to say that TV plays a pivotal role in everybody's life all around the world. I am inclined to believe that TV is the most important mass media in people's life. In this essay I will illustrate some advantages and disadvantageous of TVs.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why TV has most influance on people's life. First and foremost is that TV is the cheapest and the most reachable media for people globally. Fore example, in the furthest rurar areas in Tabat or Africa, you can see a TV set in individual's home. As a result, govrnments and broadcasting organizations can share their ideas and programmes for them. In addition, producers by advertising their products in TV are able to sell their goods more easily, so the more sell products by componies, the more job opportunities we have all around the world. Furthermore, Tv programme is a free educational system which governments can rise public awarnesses about global issues. Hence, people are more interested to use TV in their daily lives.
On the other hand, many people argued that watching TV is wasting time. Fore example, a group of social reserchers of Harvard University conducted a survey on two different groups who spent three hours a day watching Tv channel and a group who never see TV. The result revealed that the first group were four times more likely fail in their lessons at university. The relationsheep between two groups was statistically significant. Hence, watvhing TV cause distract student at studing their lessons.
In a nutshell,although there are many benefits to watching Tv, in my point of view I believe that people should spend thier time to reading books rather than wasting their time watching TV channel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , although
... studing their lessons. In a nutshell,although there are many benefits to watching Tv,...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, so, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94197952218 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.882975376 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590443686007 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3165916996 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5333333333 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122102950934 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461252578368 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0234586438901 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770246118526 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277058670448 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.